whats your order leonard,hagler,duran and hearns because some people say is duran is overrated because he lose to all three greats
Tough question but for me it goes
I like Hagler 1 because he was a durable fighter with a tough chin and could dominate with either hand. I like Hearns over Duran mainly based on the fact that even a prime Duran would still have problems with Hearns’ tall, long range style. A comparison of the two I read somewhere was that Hearns to Duran was like Foreman to Frazier. An all time great but met his match that night. That leaves Leonard. I didn’t put him last because he fought the least but I just felt that even the win against Hearns was too close where it could have gone either way. Lastly, I don’t think Duran is overrated because those 3 were arguably the best fighters of that decade and would be in other decades so I don’t think people should look at those losses and base his whole 33 year career off that, it doesn’t make sense.